Effect of medium states and pH on in vitro shoot formation and growth of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) cv Moris

المؤلفون

  • Abdelhamid M. Hamad , University of Omar Al mukhtar, Albiada, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37376/1571-000-026-002

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Pineapple,، Liquid culture، pH, Micropropagation، , Media states.

الملخص

Abstract

In vitro shoots formation, shoot weight and length of Moris pineapple explants cultured on full strength MS medium enriched with sucrose at 20 g/ l, 6-Benzylaminopurine (BAP) at 2.0 mg/l and solidified with agar at 4 and 8 g/l were compared with semi submerged explants in static liquid medium under four different medium pH adjustments (5.0; 5.5; 6.0 and 6.5). The highest shoot formations (7 shoots/ explant) was obtained on liquid medium adjusted to pH 5.0 and the heaviest (0.36 g) and tallest (61 mm) shoots obtained also in liquid medium but adjusted to pH 6.0 . However, the superiority of liquid medium could not be maintained if the medium were adjusted to inappropriate pH. No difference in shoot formation between liquid and solid medium both adjusted to pH 6.0 (4 shoots) and between liquid media adjusted to pH 5.5 and 6.5 and solid media adjusted to pH 5.0 (6 shoots). At pH 5.0; 5.5 and 6.5 liquid and solid media resulted in equal shoot weight and shoot length. Different growth parameters have different optimal pH adjustments of medium and valid comparison of states of medium could not be claimed if only one pH adjustment was made.

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

السيرة الشخصية للمؤلف

Abdelhamid M. Hamad ، , University of Omar Al mukhtar, Albiada, Libya

Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Omar Al mukhtar, Albiada, Libya

 

المراجع

References

Almeida,W.A.P.; G.S.Santana; A.P.M.Rodriguez and M.A.P.D.Costa. 2002. Optimization of a protocol for the micropropagation of pineapple. Rev.Bras. Frutic. 24 (2):296-300.

Barinova, J., C. Clement and L. Martiny. 2004. Regulation of development pathways in cultured microspores of tobacco and snapdragon by medium pH. Planta, 219: 141- 146.

Bhatia, P. and N. Ashwath. 2002. Development of a rapid method for

micropropagation of a new pineapple (Ananas comosus (L) Merr. Clone Yeppoon gold. Acta Hort.575: 125- 131

Cousson, A.; P.Toubart and T.T.Van. 1989. Control of morphogenetic pathways in thin cell layers of tobacco by pH. Canadian j. of Botany. 67: 650- 656.

Delvi, Y.S.; A.Mujib and S.C.Kundu. Efficient regenerative potential from long-term culture of pineapple. Phytomorphlogy : 255- 259

Escalona-M; Lorenzo-JC; Gonzalez-B; Daquinta-M; Gonzalez-JL; Desjardins-Y; Borroto-CG. 1999. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Reports. 18: 9, 743-748; 19 ref.

Fernando.K. 1986. In vitro propagation of Muritus pineapple. Trop. Agr. 142: 7- 19.

Firoozabady, E. and Y. Moy. 2004. Regeneration of pineapple plants via somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant 40: 67- 74.

Firoozabady, E. and N.Gutterseen. 2003. Cost effective in vitro propagation methods for pineapple. Plant Cell Report. 21: 844- 850.

Fitchet, Purnell.M. 1993. Maximum utilization of pineapple crown for micropropagation. Acta Hort. 334: 325- 330

Fitchet, M. 1990. Clonal propagation of Queen and Smooth Cayenne pineapple. Acta Hort. 275: 261- 266

Hamad, A. M. and R.M Taha. 2008. Effect of sequential subcultures on in ivitro proliferation capacity and shoot formation pattern of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) over different incubation periods. Sci. Hortic. 117: 329- 334.

Leifert, C., S. Pryce, P. J. Lumsden and W. M. Waites. 1992. Effect of medium acidity on growth and rooting of different plant species growing in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 30: 171- 179.

Mathew, V.H and T.S. Rangan. 1979. Multiple plantlets in lateral bud and leaf ex-plant in-vitro culture of pineapple. Sci. Hort. 11; 319-328.

Murashige,T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue. Physiologia Planetarum, 15: 473- 497

Pasqua, G.; F.Manes; B.Monacelli; L.Natale and S.Anselmi. 2002 Effect of the culture medium pH and ion uptake in in vitro vegetative organogenesis in thin layers of tobacco. Plant Science. 162: 947- 955.

Pasqua, G.; B.Monacelli and M.M. Altamura. 1991. Influence of pH on flower and vegetative bud initiation and development in vitro. Cytobios. 68: 111- 121.

Smith, M.K., Ko, H.-.L., Hamill, S.D. and Sanewski, G.M. 2002. Pineapple transformation : Managing somaclonal variation. Acta Hort 575: 69- 74

Soneji, J.R.; P.S. Rao and M. Mhatre. 2002. Somaclonal Variation in Micropropagated Dormant Axillary Buds of Pineapple (Ananas-Comosus L., Merr.) J. of hort. sci. and biotech. 77 (1): 28- 32

Sripaoraya, ST; M, Robert; B, Power; J, Davey and R, Michael. 2003. Plant regeneration by somatic embyogenesis and organogenesis in commercial pineapple (Ananas comosus L). In Vitro Cell. and Deve.l Biol. - Plant: 39 (5): 450–454

Teixeira, S. L., J. M. Ribeeiro and M. T. Teixeira. 2006. Influence of NaCIO on nutrient medium sterilization and on pineapple (Ananas comosus cv. Smooth cayenne) behavior. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 86: 375- 378.

William,R.R.; A.M.Taji and K.A.Winney. 1990. The effect of Ptilotus plant tissue on pH of in vitro media. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 1990, 22: 153- 158.

Winkle, S.C. and G.S. Pullman. 2003. The combined impact of pH and activated carbon on the elemental composition of a liquid conifer embryogenic tissue initiation medium. Plant Cell Reports, 22: 303- 311.

التنزيلات

منشور

2024-05-13

كيفية الاقتباس

M. Hamad , A. (2024). Effect of medium states and pH on in vitro shoot formation and growth of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) cv Moris . مجلة العلوم والدراسات الإنسانية - كلية الآداب والعلوم – المرج, (26), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37376/1571-000-026-002

إصدار

القسم

Articles