A Comparative study for Diagnosis of initial caries using Laser Fluorescence Techniques, DIAGNOdent and Conventional Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37376/ljphp.v2i1.7342Keywords:
Early diagnosis, Occlusal caries, DIAGNOdent, Laser fluorescence, Conventional methodsAbstract
Timely detection of dental caries, including early enamel lesions and advanced dentinal involvement, is essential for effective clinical management. This in vivo investigation assessed the diagnostic accuracy of conventional and fluorescence-based adjuncts across proximal, occlusal, and noncavitated facial smooth-surface lesions. A cohort of 195 patients (aged 8–40 years) underwent visual inspection, tactile probing, bitewing radiography, and evaluations using light-emitting diode (LED) fluorescence, laser-induced fluorescence, and the DIAGNOdent system. DIAGNOdent measurements were interpreted using both manufacturer-defined cutoffs and newly calibrated thresholds. Data were analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and chi-square tests, with significance at p < 0.001. ROC analysis yielded AUC values > 0.85 for fluorescence modalities, indicating robust discriminative performance.
Bitewing radiography demonstrated exceptional specificity—up to 99%—for identifying sound surfaces, corroborating findings in fluorescence studies of occlusal caries detection. DIAGNOdent showed superior sensitivity for enamel caries, with sensitivity approximating 85% using manufacturer cutoffs and 81% with revised thresholds, paralleling reported performance in vivo. Diagnostic accuracy for dentinal lesions was comparable between DIAGNOdent and traditional methods. Specifically, for noncavitated facial smooth-surface lesions, DIAGNOdent achieved over 84% overall accuracy, with sensitivity of 87.6% and specificity of 96.9%. Interobserver agreement across modalities was moderate to high (κ = 0.33–0.75), indicating reproducibility consistent with prior DIAGNOdent pen evaluations. Integration of visual inspection with fluorescence-based methods further enhanced diagnostic metrics, underscoring the value of adjunctive fluorescence devices. Overall, advanced fluorescence-based diagnostics—particularly DIAGNOdent—offer increased sensitivity and high specificity, supporting their clinical utility in early caries detection and timely intervention
References
Fejerskov, O., Nyvad, B. and Kidd, E. eds., 2015. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. John Wiley & Sons.
- Pitts, N.B., Zero, D.T., Marsh, P.D., Ekstrand, K., Weintraub, J.A., Ramos-Gomez, F., Tagami, J., Twetman, S., Tsakos, G. and Ismail, A., 2017. Dental caries. Nature reviews Disease primers, 3(1), pp.1-16, DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.30.
- Conte, M., Broder, H.L., Jenkins, G., Reed, R. and Janal, M.N., 2006. Oral health, related behaviors and oral health impacts among homeless adults. Journal of public health dentistry, 66(4), pp.276-278, DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2006.tb04082.x.
- Sürme, K., Kara, N.B. and Yilmaz, Y., 2020. In vitro evaluation of occlusal caries detection methods in primary and permanent teeth: a comparison of CarieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent Pen, and DIAGNOcam methods. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 38(2), pp.105-111, DOI: 10.1089/photob.2019.4686.
- Sato, H., Da Silva, J.D., Lee, C., Yonemoto, H., Kuwajima, Y., Ohyama, H., Lambert, R.F., Izumisawa, M., Takahashi, N. and Nagai, S., 2021. Effects of healthcare policy and education on reading accuracy of bitewing radiographs for interproximal caries. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 50(2), p.20200153, DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20200153.
- Mallya, S. and Lam, E., 2018. White and Pharoah's oral radiology: principles and interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences.
- Wenzel, A., 2014. Radiographic display of carious lesions and cavitation in approximal surfaces: advantages and drawbacks of conventional and advanced modalities. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 72(4), pp.251-264, DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2014.888757.
- Kapor, S., Rankovic, M.J., Khazaei, Y., Crispin, A., Schüler, I., Krause, F., Lussi, A., Neuhaus, K., Eggmann, F., Michou, S. and Ekstrand, K., 2021. Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic methods for occlusal surface caries. Clinical oral investigations, 25(8), pp.4801-4815, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04024-1.
- Ozsevik, A.S., Kararslan, E.S., Aktan, A.M., Bozdemir, E., Cebe, F. and Sarı, F., 2015. Effect of different contact materials on approximal caries detection by laser fluorescence and light-emitting diode devices. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 33(10), pp.492-497, DOI: 10.1089/pho.2015.3930.
- Zhang, O.L., Yin, I.X., Yu, O.Y., Luk, K., Niu, J.Y. and Chu, C.H., 2025. Advanced Lasers and Their Applications in Dentistry. Dentistry Journal, 13(1), p.37, DOI: 10.3390/dj13010037.
- Kanar, Ö., Korkut, B. and Tağtekin, D., 2025. Assessment of the correlation between fluorescence-featured intraoral scanner, laser fluorescence and spectrophotometric analyses in caries-affected dentin: an in-vitro diagnostic accuracy study. Lasers in Medical Science, 40(1), pp.1-12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04390-2.
- Huth, K.C., Neuhaus, K.W., Gygax, M., Bücher, K., Crispin, A., Paschos, E., Hickel, R. and Lussi, A., 2008. Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. Journal of dentistry, 36(12), pp.1033-1040, doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.013
- Kocak-Topbas, N., Kamburoğlu, K., Ertürk-Avunduk, A.T., Ozemre, M.O., Eratam, N. and Çakmak, E.E., 2023. Clinical performance of diagnostic methods in third molar teeth with early occlusal caries. Diagnostics, 13(2), p.284, https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020284.
- Innes, N.P.T., Frencken, J.E., Bjørndal, L., Maltz, M., Manton, D.J., Ricketts, D., Van Landuyt, K., Banerjee, A., Campus, G., Doméjean, S. and Fontana, M., 2016. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Advances in dental research, 28(2), pp.49-57, DOI: 10.1177/0022034516639276.
- Banerjee, A., 2013. Minimal intervention dentistry: part 7. Minimally invasive operative caries management: rationale and techniques. British dental journal, 214(3), pp.107-111, DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.106.
- Brons‐Piche, E., Eckert, G.J. and Fontana, M., 2019. Predictive validity of a caries risk assessment model at a dental school. Journal of Dental Education, 83(2), pp.144-150, https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.019.017.
- Ismail, A.I., Pitts, N.B., Tellez, M. and Authors of the International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS), 2015, December. The International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS™) an example of a caries management pathway. In BMC oral health (Vol. 15, pp. 1-13). BioMed Central, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/15/S1/S9.
- Foros, P., Oikonomou, E., Koletsi, D. and Rahiotis, C., 2021. Detection methods for early caries diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Caries Research, 55(4), pp.247-259, https://doi.org/10.1159/000516084.
- Abdelaziz, M., 2023. Detection, diagnosis, and monitoring of early caries: the future of individualized dental care. Diagnostics, 13(24), p.3649. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13243649.
- Olivi, G. and Genovese, M.D., 2015. Laser Applications for Caries Diagnosis and Prevention. Lasers in Restorative Dentistry: A Practical Guide, pp.111-139. DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47317-7.
- Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G., 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.
- Tassery, H. and Manton, D.J., 2016. Detection and diagnosis of carious lesions. Evidence-Based Caries Prevention, pp.13-39. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40034-1.
- Castro, A.L.S., Vianna, M.I.P. and Mendes, C.M.C., 2018. Comparison of caries lesion detection methods in epidemiological surveys: CAST, ICDAS and MF. BMC Oral Health, 18, pp.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0583-6.
- Bossuyt, P.M., Reitsma, J.B., Bruns, D.E., Gatsonis, C.A., Glasziou, P.P., Irwig, L.M., Moher, D., Rennie, D., De Vet, H.C. and Lijmer, J.G., 2003. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clinical chemistry, 49(1), pp.7-18. https://doi.org/10.1373/49.1.7.
- Pitts, N.B., Ekstrand, K.R. and ICDAS Foundation, 2013. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and its International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS)–methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 41(1), pp.e41-e52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12025.
- Sichani, A.V., Javadinejad, S. and Ghafari, R., 2016. Diagnostic value of DIAGNOdent in detecting caries under composite restorations of primary molars. Dental Research Journal, 13(4), pp.327-332.
- Kämppi, A., Tanner, T., Päkkilä, J., Patinen, P., Tjäderhane, L. and Anttonen, V., 2016. Comparison of simple screening criteria with the International Caries Detection and Assessment System classification in determining restorative treatment need. International Dental Journal, 66(2), pp.63-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12204.
- Sürme, K., Kara, N.B. and Yilmaz, Y., 2020. In vitro evaluation of occlusal caries detection methods in primary and permanent teeth: a comparison of CarieScan PRO, DIAGNOdent Pen, and DIAGNOcam methods. Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery, 38(2), pp.105-111. https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4686.
- Schwendicke, F., Tzschoppe, M. and Paris, S., 2015. Radiographic caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry, 43(8), pp.924-933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009.
- Sinanoglu, A., Ozturk, E. and Ozel, E., 2014. Diagnosis of occlusal caries using laser fluorescence versus conventional methods in permanent posterior teeth: a clinical study. Photomedicine and laser surgery, 32(3), pp.130-137. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2013.3625.
- Momeni-Moghaddam, M., Hashemi, C., Fathi, A. and Khamesipour, F., 2022. Diagnostic accuracy, available treatment, and diagnostic methods of dental caries in practice: a meta-analysis. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 11(1), p.62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088‑022‑00243‑x.
- Zero, D.T., Fontana, M., Martínez-Mier, E.A., Ferreira-Zandona, A., Ando, M., Gonzalez-Cabezas, C. and Bayne, S., 2009. The biology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of dental caries: scientific advances in the United States. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 140, pp.25S-34S.
- Gomez, J., 2015. Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC oral health, 15(Suppl 1), p.S3. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6831/15/S1/S3.
- Murty, S., 2024. Minimally Invasive Endodontic Techniques: Balancing Tooth Preservation and Treatment Outcomes. Journal of dental care, 1(2), pp.12-21.
- Kwiatek, J., Leśna, M., Piskórz, W. and Kaczewiak, J., 2025. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of an AI-Based System for Dental Caries Detection and Clinical Evaluation Conducted by Dentists. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), p.1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051566.
- Sheiham, A. and Watt, R.G., 2000. The common risk factor approach: a rational basis for promoting oral health. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology: Commentary, 28(6), pp.399-406. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.028006399.x.
- Tashkandi, A.K., Jiffri, S.O., Albalawi, R.M., Albukhari, S.A., Mugharbil, S.A. and Yeslam, H.E., 2025. Detection of proximal dental caries in primary teeth with a near-infrared-irradiation-assisted intraoral scanner: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health, 25(1), p.270. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05629-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Libyan Journal of Public Health Practices
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
