التحقيق في احتياجات الطلاب باستخدام المنهج الشامل في تعلّم اللغة الأجنبية
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37376/fesj.vi16.7107الكلمات المفتاحية:
تحليل الاحتياجات، المنهج المختلط، برنامج القراءة الأدبية، طريقة النص، تصورات الطلابالملخص
تعتبر هذه الدراسة محاولة للتعرف على احتياجات طلاب برنامج القراءة الأدبية في قسم اللغة الإنجليزية، كلية الآداب والعلوم (فرع سلوق). وعلى الرغم من أن الأدب الإنجليزي يعتبر مادة جامعية مقررة في جميع أقسام اللغة الإنجليزية بالجامعات الليبية، إلا أنه لم يتم إجراء بحث نظامي لدراسة احتياجات الطلاب من مواد الأدب الإنجليزي في السياق الليبي للتحقيق في مزاياها أو عيوبها. ولذلك فإن الأساس المنطقي لإجراء هذه الدراسة هو أن برنامج القراءة الأدبية قد تم تصميمه دون مراعاة احتياجات الطلاب وتصوراتهم حول هذا البرنامج. اعتمدت هذه الدراسة المنهج المختلط لاستنباط تصورات الطلاب باستخدام الاستبيان والمقابلة لجمع البيانات النوعية والكمية لإثراء التحليل. وقد تم تصميم الاستبيان والمقابلة وفق المنهج الشامل لتعلم أدب اللغات الأجنبية والذي من خلاله يختار الطلاب المكونات التي تلبي احتياجاتهم. وكذلك تم إجراء مقالبة لأستاذ المادة لاستقصاء وجه نظره حول هذا البرنامج. وكشفت الدراسة أن 40% من الطلاب عبروا عن حاجتهم لتطبيق منهج النص في برنامج القراءة الأدبية. وتعتبر المساهمة الرئيسية لهذه الدراسة في أنها لا تعرض فقط نتائج احتياجات الطلاب كما هو الحال في معظم الدراسات المعنية بمجال تحليل الاحتياجات؛ بل إنها تقدم أيضًا برنامج القراءة الأدبية الذي يمكن وضعه موضع التنفيذ من قبل صانعي السياسات في قسم اللغة الإنجليزية.
التنزيلات
المراجع
Abdelrady, A. H., Jahara, S. F., Elmadani, A. E. A., & Kumar, T. (2022). The attitude of Sudanese EFL students towards literature to enrich their vocabulary building. Education Research International, 2022(1), 7569371.
Al-Busaidi, S. (2003). Academic needs of EFL learners in the intensive English language program at Sultan Qaboos University in the Sultanate of Oman. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States-Illinois.
Al-Tamimi, A., & Shuib, M. (2010). Investigating the English Language needs of petroleum engineering students at Hadhramout University of Science and Technology. The Asian ESP Journal Volume. 6(1), 6-34.
Ali, H. I. H., & Salih, A. R. A. (2013). Perceived Views of Language Teachers on the Use of Needs Analysis in ESP Materials Writing. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 11-19.
Antony, J., McDermott, O., Sony, M., Toner, A., Bhat, S., Cudney, E. A., & Doulatabadi, M. (2023). Benefits, challenges, critical success factors and motivations of Quality 4.0–A qualitative global study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(7-8), 827-846.
Ariani, S. (2021). Should Literary Texts be Used in Teaching and Learning Grammar? Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni (Sesanti), 305-313.
Barrette, C., Paesani, K., & Vinall, K. (2010). Toward an integrated curriculum: maximizing the use of target language literature. Foreign Language Annals 43,(2), 216–30.
Bloemert, J., Paran, A., Jansen, E., & Van de Grift, W. (2019). Students’ perspective on the benefits of EFL literature education. The Language Learning Journal, 47(3), 371-384.
Bloemert, J., Paran, A., & Jansen, E. (2020). Connecting students and researchers: the secondary school student’s voice in foreign language education research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(4), 429-449.
Byrne, J., & Humble, A. (2007). An introduction to mixed method research. Atlantic Research Centre for Family-work Issues, 1, 1-4.
Chemir, S., & Kitila, T. (2022). Learners’ needs analysis for English for academic purposes in ethiopian higher education institutions: The case of Wachemo University freshman students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2022.2026190
Cresswell, J., & Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angles: Sage.
Dudley-Evans, T., & John, M. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fadel, S., & Rajab, H. (2017). Investigating the English Language Needs of the Female Students at the Faculty of Computing and Information Technology at King Abdulaziz University in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 69-82.
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Göçer, A. (2010). A comparative research on the effectivity of cooperative learning method and jigsaw technique on teaching literary genres. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(8), 439-45.
Hoecherl-Alden, G. (2006). Connecting language to content: Second language literature instruction at the intermediate level. Foreign Language Annals 39(2), 244–54.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ishak, C. N. (2019). Metaphorical Analysis of Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of ESP. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(1), 56-76.
Jääskä, E., Lehtinen, J., Kujala, J., & Kauppila, O. (2022). Game-based learning and students’ motivation in project management education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100055.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396-403.
Mackay, R., & Palmer, J. (1981). Languages for Specific Purposes. Program Design and Evaluation. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., 54 Warehouse Lane, Rowley, MA 01969.
Martin, A., & Laurie, I. (1993). Student views about the contribution of literary and cultural content to language learning at intermediate level. Foreign Language Annals, 26(2), 189–207.
Maurer, T., & Pierce, H. (1998). A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 324-29.
McConn, M. (2018). Close reading of literary nonfiction: The three-column journal. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(2), 66-71.
Nunan, D. (1988). The Learner-centered Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nurfebrianti, P. (2023). The Development of Non-Fiction Text Books for Class XI Vocational High Schools Based on the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition Learning Model. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(8), 18-24.
Paesani, K., & Allen, H. (2012). Beyond the language-content divide: Research on advanced foreign language instruction at the postsecondary level. Foreign Language Annals 45(1), 54–75.
Pranoto, B & S. (2020). A Need analysis of ESP for physical education students in Indonesia. Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 93-109.
Rachmawati, U. (2020). What Lies Behind the Students’ Need in English for Specific Purposes: A Reflection of Needs: A Reflection of Needs Analysis. JOLLT Journal of Language and Language Teaching, 8 (2), 213-221.
Ray, J. (1980). How many answer categories should attitude and personality scales use? South African Journal of Psychology, 10(1-2), 53–54.
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (1991). ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. Prentice Hall. UK: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.
Schutz, N., & Derwing, B. (1981). The problem of needs assessment in English for specific purposes: Some theoretical and practical considerations. Language for specific purposes program design and evaluation, 29-45.
Septiana, et al (2020). Needs analysis based English syllabus for computer science students of Bina Darma University. Journal of English Education, 8 (2), 299-309.
Soy, S., Maisarah, I., & Sovann, L. (2023). Students’ perceptions of literary texts, challenges in learning, and learning strategies. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 6(2), 81-94.
Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2022). Likert scale in social sciences research: Problems and difficulties. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 16(4), 89-101.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 3-50. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tsang, A., Paran, A., & Lau, W. W. (2023). The language and non-language benefits of literature in foreign language education: An exploratory study of learners’ views. Language Teaching Research, 27(5), 1120-1141.
Morse, J. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, 189-208. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vaughn, M., Sotirovska, V., Darragh, J. J., & Elhess, M. (2021). Examining agency in children’s nonfiction picture books. Children's Literature in Education, 1-19.
Wardani, A., & Adityo, A. (2021). Investigating Terminologies in Teaching Literature: A Corpus Study. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 6(2), 198-203.
Weber, A. (2018). Teaching grammar through literature in foreign language learning with German as an example. Per Linguam, 34(1), 78-89.

التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 مجلة كلية التربية العلمية

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.