Review Method

1-      Reviewing  is conducted in strict confidentiality, as the reviewer does not know the name of the researcher, and the researcher does not know the name of the reviewer.

2-      The research is referred by a letter to three reviewers

3-      Reviewing time is not more than month, and if the reviewer is late, the editorial board communicates with him, and in the event that the reviewer does not respond, the research is sent to another reviewer.

4-      Each research shall be allocated a number of not less than three reviewers, one of whom is at least an associate professor, and in all cases the degree of the reviewer must be higher than the degree of the researcher, and in the case of joint research, the degree of the reviewers must be higher than the degree of the highest degree researcher. If the researcher or researchers in joint research have the rank of professor, reviewers of the same grade shall be appointed for him, with precedence in obtaining the degree over the researcher. If the opinions of the reviewers differ, the research may be published if it obtains the approval of (2) reviewers out of (3) reviewers. 

5-      After deleting the name of the researcher, the research is sent to three reviewers, accompanied by a scientific examination and evaluation sheet, containing six elements for evaluating the research, and then the final result, which are as follows: The research is valid for publication.                - The research is valid for publication after modification.              The research is not valid for publication.

6-      In Rejection; a detailed report is requested in this case explaining the reasons for the rejection of the research for publication and its justifications. After approving the publication of the research, the researcher is given a publication license for his research, in which the issue, volume  and year of the publication are determined.

7-       The reviewer should be from the exact specialization of the research, and from the list of reviewers approved by the Committee for the Follow-up of Scientific Journals at the University of Benghazi, taking into account the diversity of reviewer, and not limited to certain people,

8-      Research only accepted if it  obtains at least 65% of the total evaluation points.