Responsibilities of Reviewers
Peer reviewers are the backbone of scholarly publishing. By accepting an invitation to review a manuscript for the Libyan Journal of Dentistry, a reviewer accepts the following responsibilities.
Eligibility and Acceptance
- Accept a review invitation only if you have the necessary subject expertise and the time to deliver a thorough review within the agreed deadline;
- Decline promptly if either condition is not met, and where possible suggest an alternative reviewer;
- Disclose any conflict of interest at the point of accepting the invitation.
Confidentiality
- Treat the manuscript and all associated material as strictly confidential;
- Do not share, discuss, distribute, or use the manuscript in any form outside the assigned review;
- Do not upload the manuscript to any public or third-party service, including AI tools;
- Do not contact the authors directly about the manuscript.
Objectivity and Tone
- Evaluate the manuscript on its scientific merit, independently of the author's identity, institution, or nationality;
- Provide reasoned, constructive feedback that helps the authors improve the work;
- Frame criticisms respectfully and avoid personal or institutional remarks.
Scientific Rigour
- Assess the originality, importance, and validity of the work;
- Assess the appropriateness of the methods, the soundness of the analysis, and the reliability of the conclusions;
- Identify any concerns about research integrity and report them to the handling editor.
Recommendation
Provide a clear recommendation chosen from four options: Accept; Minor revision; Major revision; or Reject.
Timeliness
- Respond to the invitation within 72 hours;
- Complete the review within the agreed deadline (normally four weeks for the first round);
- Notify the handling editor promptly if a delay becomes unavoidable.
Reviewer Rights
Reviewers have the right to: decline an invitation without giving a reason; withdraw from a review where a conflict of interest emerges; receive a Certificate of Review on request; receive feedback on the editorial decision; and be considered for Editorial Board membership.



